21.Selection criteria:
The following selection criteria will be applied to candidates. Where applications are submitted by a consortium, the selection criteria will apply to the consortium as a whole, unless specifically stipulated otherwise. The selection criteria shall not apply to natural persons and single-member companies working as subcontractors.
1) Economic and financial capacity of candidate:
(a) the candidate's average annual turnover for the past 3 financial years for which accounts have been closed (2013, 2014 and 2015) must have exceeded 1 000 000 EUR;
(b) the general liquidity ratio (short-term assets/short-term liabilities) for the last financial year for which accounts have been closed must be at least 1:5.
2) Professional capacity of candidate:
at least 2 members of the whole of the candidate's (and/or consortium's) permanent staff must be specialised in 1 of the following fields, so that the overall experience covers all of these fields:
(a) land policy/land management in rural areas — coordination — planning;
(b) administration — public finance management — budget support.
3) Technical capacity of candidate:
(a) the candidate (and/or consortium) must have successfully implemented at least 1 technical assistance project in the fields of general budget support or sector-based budget support, with a value of 1 000 000 EUR, which was carried out at any time during the 5 years prior to the submission deadline;
(b) the candidate (and/or consortium) must have successfully implemented at least 1 project in the area of land policy/land management in rural areas, amounting to at least 1 000 000 EUR, which was carried out at any time during the 5 years prior to the submission deadline.
For both criteria, this means that the project the candidate refers to could have been started or completed at any time during the period given. However, it need not necessarily have been completed during this period, or have been carried out during the whole of said period. Candidates or tenderers may refer to either a project completed during the reference period (although started before this period) or to part of a contract that has not yet been fully carried out. In the first scenario, the project will be considered as a whole, subject to proof of satisfactory performance (statement from the entity having awarded the contract, proof of final payment); in the case of ongoing projects, only the part which has been successfully carried out by the candidate may be used as a reference. The candidate must be able to provide documentary proof of satisfactory performance of this part (statement from the entity having awarded the contract, proof of final payment) and the corresponding amount. If the project referred to has been implemented by a consortium, in the event that a selection criterion relating to the relevance of the experience is used, the supporting documents must clearly show the proportion completed by the candidate, as well as a description of the nature of services provided.
Previous experience involving a breach of contract and termination by a contracting authority cannot be used as a reference.
An economic operator may, if necessary and for a specific contract, make use of the capacities of other entities irrespective of the legal nature of the connection between itself and said entities. In such an event, it must provide the contracting authority with proof that it will have the resources needed to carry out the contract by, for example, producing a written commitment undertaken by said entities to make such resources available. Such entities, for instance the economic operator's parent company, must observe the same eligibility rules — notably regarding nationality — and meet the same selection criteria as the economic operator. With regard to the technical and professional criteria, an economic operator may only use the capacities of other entities if they carry out the work or provide the services for which said capacities are required. With regard to the economic and financial capacity, the entities whose capacities the tenderer uses become jointly and severally liable for performance of the contract.
If more than 8 applications prove to be eligible, i.e. meet all the selection criteria, then the strengths and weaknesses of these candidates' applications must be re-examined to determine which 8 applications are most suitable for the invitation to tender. Only the following factors will be considered in the re-examination:
1) the most projects in criterion 3(b);
2) the highest project value in criterion 3(b).